High CourtsSingle Bench

A. Vimalan vs The District Collector cum Regional Transport Authority

Madras High Court · Decided on 16 June 2011 · Citation: (2011) 06 MAD CK 0109

HON’BLE JUDGES
M. Jaichandren, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 13905 of 2011

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 198 words

M. Jaichandren, J.—Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner and the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the

Respondent.

2 At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the

Respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 21.4.2011, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period.

3.

The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court.

4.

In view of the submissions made by the learned Counsels appearing on either side, the Respondent is directed to dispose of the representation,

dated 21.4.2011, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The

Petitioner is directed to furnish a copy of the representation, dated 21.4.2011, to the Respondent, along with a copy of this order. However, it is

made clear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter.

The writ petition is disposed of, with the above directions. No costs.