High CourtsSingle Bench

Aakash Gurung & Ors vs State Of Sikkim & Ors.

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 5 March 2024 · Citation: (2024) 03 SIK CK 0015

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 34 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 111 words

Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J

1.

Counter-affidavit has been filed by the respondent nos. 4, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14, 18, 19, 24, 25 and 26. The records reveal that the notices have been served to respondent nos. 6, 15, and 23 who are neither present nor are they represented. Un-served notices have been received by the Registry in so far as respondent nos. 5 and 28 are concerned. Consignment details have not been found vis-à-vis respondent nos. 7, 10, 13, 16, 17, 21, 22 and 27 are concerned. Re-issue notices upon the un-served respondents subject to filing of requisites within three days. “Dasti” in addition is permitted.

2.

List on 19.04.2024.