High CourtsSingle Bench

Aashu vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 18 April 2024 · Citation: (2024) 04 UK CK 0093

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Maithani, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 395, 412 · Arms Act, 1959 — Section 3, 25
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 690 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 142 words

Ravindra Maithani, J

1.

The applicant is in judicial custody in FIR/Case Crime No.433 of 2023, dated 04.11.2023, under Sections 395, 412 IPC and Sections 3/25 of The Arms Act, 1959, Police Station Vikasnagar, District Dehradun. He has sought his release on bail.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3.

It is argued that the co-accused having similar role have already been granted bail.

4.

This fact is admitted by the learned State counsel.

5.

Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

6.

The bail application is allowed.

7.

Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.