High CourtsSingle Bench

Aashuram vs State Of Rajasthan And Others

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 22 August 2023 · Citation: (2023) 08 RAJ CK 0095

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Garg, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Scheduled Caste And Scheduled Tribe (Prevention Of Atrocities) Act, 1989 — Section 14A(1), 3(2)(va) · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 120B, 323, 341, 365, 384 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Appeal No. 1640 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 346 words

Manoj Kumar Garg, J

Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned Public Prosecutor as well as counsel for the respondent No.2 and perused the material available on record.

The instant appeal has been filed under Section 14A (1) of SC/ST Act on behalf of the appellant, who is in custody in connection with FIR No.448/2023, Police Station Saveena, District Udaipur for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 384, 365 and 120-B of IPC and Section 3(2)(va) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocity) Act and against the order dated 10.08.2023 passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST Act (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Udaipur whereby the bail application preferred under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the appellant was rejected.

Counsel for the appellant submits that similar situated co-accused Dharmendra has already been enlarged on bail by this Court and case of present appellant is similar to that of co-accused. The accused-appellant is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-appellant.

Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the respondent No.2 have opposed the prayer for bail.

Having regard to the entirety of facts and circumstances as available on record and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced at the bar, this Court is of the opinion that the order rejecting the application for bail filed on behalf of the appellant, cannot be sustained and deserves to be set aside.

Consequently, the instant appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated 10.08.2023 passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST Act (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Udaipur is set aside. It is ordered that the accused-appellant Aashuram S/o Dudaram arrested in connection with FIR No.448/2023, Police Station Saveena, District Udaipur shall be released on bail; provided he furnish a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- and two surety bonds of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before that court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.