High CourtsSingle Bench

Abdul Gaffar vs District Magistrate, Haridwar & Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 1 November 2021 · Citation: (2021) 11 UK CK 0220

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Uttar Pradesh Zamidari Abolition And Land Reforms Act, 1950 — Section 209
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 2529 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 153 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

According to the petitioner, his land has been encroached by his neighbours, who are not removing their encroachment, despite repeated requests.

2.

By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought following relief:-

i. Issue an appropriate order or direction directing the respondent authorities to conduct the demarcation of the land of the petitioner depicted by Khata no. 0007Khasra No. 806 Rakbai 0.0870 hectare and Khasra no. 864 rakbai 0.0230 hectare total 0.1100 hectare situated at Mauza Toda Kalyanpur Paragna and Tehsil Roorkee District Haridwar.

3.

Since petitioner wants possession over his agricultural holding, therefore, the relief, as claimed in the writ petition, can only be sought by filing a suit under Section 209 of U.P. Zamidari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950.

4.

In such view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to approach appropriate forum available under the law.