High CourtsSingle Bench

Abdul Hameed.U vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 8 March 2023 · Citation: (2023) 03 KL CK 0074

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr Kauser Edappagath, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 109, 370A(2), 376, 376D
RESULT
Single Bench
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 1075 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 477 words

Dr Kauser Edappagath, J

1.

This application is filed u/s 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking regular bail.

2.

The applicant is the accused No.1 in Crime No.171/2022 of Kasargod Vanitha Police Station. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 376, 370 A (2), 376 D, 109 of IPC.

3.

The prosecution case, in short, is that one day in November 2022, the 3rd accused brought the victim from Patla to Jasmin Cottage, Madhur village, in his car and the applicant and the 2nd accused committed rape on her in the said cottage and there by committed the offence.

4.

I have heard Sri.T.B.Shajimon, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri.V.S.Sreejith, the learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to get bail. On the other hand, the learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant, and he is not entitled to bail at this stage.

6.

The applicant was remanded to judicial custody on 22.12.2022 and the investigation of the case is over. There was one month delay in lodging the FIR. Even according to the version of the victim, she went voluntarily to the Jasmin Cottage mentioned above along with accused No.3. For all these reasons, I do not find any reason to hold that the continued detention of the applicant is required for any purpose. Hence, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions: -

(i) The applicant shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Magistrate/Court.

(ii) The applicant shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

(iii) The applicant shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m. on every Saturday until further orders. He shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of the bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.