High CourtsSingle Bench

Abdul Kalam vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 5 April 2024 · Citation: (2024) 04 UK CK 0028

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Maithani, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 120B, 376, 506 · Protection Of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — Section 3, 4 · Information Technology Act, 2000 — Section 66D
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Third Bail Application No. 27 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 127 words

Ravindra Maithani, J

1.

Applicant Abdul Kalam is in judicial custody in FIR No.60 of 2022 (Special Sessions Trial No.26 of 2022), under Sections 376, 506, 120-B IPC, Section ¾ of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and Section 66-D of the Information Technology Act, 2000, Police Station Kotwali Dehradun, District Dehradun. He has sought his release on bail.

2.

This is the third bail application. The first bail application, being BA1 No.1755 of 2022, was rejected on 14.09.2022. The second bail application, being BA2 No.310 of 2023, was rejected on 07.11.2023.

3.

Having considered, this Court does not see any new ground, which may entitle the applicant to bail. Accordingly, the bail application deserves to be rejected.

4.

The bail application is rejected.