AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
14 paragraphs · 391 wordsBechu Kurian Thomas, J
This is an application for regular bail filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Petitioner is the sole accused in Crime No.230/2022 of Melparamba Police Station, Kasargod District. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections 354A(1)(i) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 10 r/w Section 9(m) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012
The prosecution allegation is that, the accused had sexually assaulted the victim, who is a minor girl of 12 years on 14.12.2019 and thereby, committed the offences alleged.
Sri.Umasankar, learned Counsel for the petitioner contended that the entire prosecution case is false and that petitioner is innocent of the allegations and since the petitioner was arrested on 28.06.2022, the continued detention of the petitioner is not required.
Smt.M.K.Pushpalatha, learned Public Prosecutor, on the other hand opposed the grant of bail and submitted that the petitioner has committed a serious crime and that he ought not be released on bail.
A perusal of the case diary reveals that prima facie there are materials on record to connect the petitioner with the crime. However, since the petitioner was remanded to judicial custody on 28.06.2022, I am of the view that the continued detention of the petitioner is not required in the circumstances of the case. Therefore, the petitioner is entitled to be released on bail.
In the result, this application is allowed on the following conditions:-
(i) Petitioner shall be released on bail on his executing a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the court having jurisdiction.
(ii) Petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required;
(iii) Petitioner shall not intimidate or attempt to influence the witnesses; nor shall he tamper with the evidence or contact the defacto complainant or her family members.
(iv) Petitioner shall not commit any similar offences while he is on bail.
(v) Petitioner shall not leave India without the permission of the Court having jurisdiction.
In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the jurisdictional Court shall be empowered to consider the application for cancellation, if any, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law, notwithstanding the bail having been granted by this Court.
