High CourtsSingle Bench

Abdul Rahiman vs Mayyaddi

Karnataka High Court · Decided on 24 June 2025 · Citation: (2025) 06 KAR CK 0223

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravi V. Hosmani, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Civil Procedure, 1908 — Order 39 Rule 1, Order 39 Rule 2
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Revision Petition No. 557 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 176 words

Shivashankar Amarannavar, J

1.

Joint application is filed under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter for the sake of brevity referred to as the N.I. Act) and it is signed by learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for respondent. In the application it is stated that the matter has been settled between the petitioner and the respondent and settlement amount of Rs.75,000/- has been received by the respondent.

2.

In view of settlement, offence under Section 138 of the N.I. Act is compounded. In view of compounding of the offence, this revision petition is disposed of.

3.

Learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for respondent submits that the petitioner is in judicial custody for serving the sentence passed under the impugned judgments.

4.

In view of settlement of the matter and compounding of the offence, the trial Court is directed to issue release intimation to the concerned prison if the petitioner is not required in any other case.

5.

Registry is directed to communicate this order to the trial Court by e-mail.