High CourtsSingle Bench

Abhay Sharma and Another vs State of Punjab and Another

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 23 May 2014 · Citation: (2014) 05 P&H CK 0398

HON’BLE JUDGES
R.P. Nagrath, J
CASE NUMBER
CRM No. M-33946 of 2013 (O&M)

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 225 words

R.P. Nagrath, J.—The instant petition has been filed for quashing FIR No. 66 dated 13.4.2009 for offences under Sections 498A, 420 IPC, Police Station Model Town, Hoshiarpur and the subsequent proceedings on the basis of written compromise arrived at between the parties.

2.

Report from the trial Court has been received after recording statements of parties, alongwith original statements. It is reported that compromise is voluntary and without any coercion or undue influence.

3.

Learned State counsel on instructions from HC Ranjit submits that petitioners are the only accused in this FIR, which was recorded by respondent No. 2 who is the only aggrieved person.

4.

No useful purpose would be served in continuing the proceedings in this case in view of the compromise arrived at between them.

5.

Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others v. State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 (P&H) and approved by the Hon''ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and Another, , this petition is allowed and FIR No. 66 dated 13.4.2009 for offences under Sections 498A, 420 IPC, Police Station Model Town, Hoshiarpur and the subsequent proceedings conducted on the basis thereof, are quashed.

6.

Needless to say that parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements.