High CourtsSingle Bench

Abid Ansari vs State Of Jharkhand

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 16 August 2021 · Citation: (2021) 08 JH CK 0036

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anil Kumar Choudhary, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 323, 341, 498A, 504, 506 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438(2)
CASE NUMBER
A.B.A. No. 5476 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

20 paragraphs · 364 words

Anil Kumar Choudhary, J

Apprehending his arrest in connection with Rehla P.S. Case No.112 of 2020 instituted under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 498-A/34 of the Indian Penal

Code, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail.

Learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission of this Court to implead the informant as opposite party No.2 and the wife of the petitioner as opposite

party no.3 of the instant anticipatory bail application.

Permission is accorded.

The petitioner is directed to incorporate the name of the informant as opposite party No.2 and the wife of the petitioner as opposite party no.3 of the

instant anticipatory bail application within one week after the lockdown is over.

Let notice be issued to O.P. Nos.2 and 3 under registered cover with A/D as well as under ordinary process for which requisites etc. must be filed

within two weeks by the petitioner, failing which, this anticipatory bail application shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Bench.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner being husband of the daughter of the informant

treated her with cruelty. It is next submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and general and omnibus in nature. It is further

submitted that because of marital discord between the parties, this false case has been foisted against the petitioner. Hence, it is submitted that the

petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail.

Learned Addl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

List this case on 25.10.2021.

Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts as discussed, I am inclined to pass an interim order of anticipatory bail to the petitioner

till 25.10.2021. In case of the petitioner being arrested by the police on or before 25.10.2021, he shall be released on bail provisionally on furnishing bail

bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the officer concerned in connection with

Rehla P.S. Case No.112 of 2020 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.