AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
5 paragraphs · 211 wordsRakesh Kumar, J.—The sole petitioner, while invoking inherent jurisdiction of this Court u/s 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has prayed for quashing of the entire proceeding in Tr. No. 421 of 1999 (Kotwali P.S. Case No. 21 of 1995) and has also prayed for quashing of the order dated 11.1.1999 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in Tr. No. 421 of 1999 (Kotwali P.S. Case No. 21 of 1995), whereby the learned Magistrate has taken cognizance of the offences u/s 406, 380, 120B and 109 of the Indian Penal Code.
I have examined the impugned order as well as the F.I.R. While taking cognizance of the offences, the learned Magistrate has committed no error. Accordingly, I do not find any merit in the present petition and the petition stands rejected.
The present case was admitted on 8.9.1999. While admitting the case, this Court had directed that during the pendency of this application further proceeding in the court below in Tr. No. 421 of 1999 (Kotwali P.S. Case No. 21 of 1999) shall remain stayed
In view of the rejection of the present petition, the interim order of stay stands automatically vacated.
Let a copy of this order be sent to the court below forthwith.