Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench

Acn Digital Pvt Ltd vs Chouksey Entertainment Ltd

Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 4 November 2022 · Citation: (2022) 11 TDSAT CK 0020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ram Krishna Gautam, Member
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Broadcasting Petition No. 66 Of 2018, 704 Of 2016 With Misc Application No. 71 Of 2018

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 197 words

BP No. 66 of 2018

Even after delivery of notice to petitioner, none is to press.  Since previous two dates, none used to appear. Though counsel was present but had taken discharge because of no instruction from his client i.e petitioner.

Under above circumstances, it is apparent that petitioner is not intending to contest this petition. As petition is of old year 2018, probably interest had gone.

Hence, the same is being dismissed for non-prosecution.

BP No. 704 of 2016

Learned counsel for petitioner is present.  Whereas counsel for respondent who had taken his discharge is present. But none is for respondent. As respondent is not appearing nor giving any instructions to his counsel, it is being said to be deliberate one.

A request is being made for service through police mode for ensuring presence and version of the respondent.

Hence, let steps be taken, by way of affidavit, detailing police station etc. for making the service through concerned police station to respondent(s).  It be filed by the petitioner within two weeks. Then after notice be issued through police mode to the respondent(s) fixing date for further direction by office.

List the matter ‘for directions’ on 10.1.2023.