High Courts

Adhiragi Chetty vs Billa Tyampu

Madras High Court · Decided on 31 March 1910 · Citation: (1910) 20 MLJ 944

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 125 words
1.

Exhibit B modifies the terms of the lease Exhibit A. It provides that on default of payment by the due date the rent in arrears shall be paid with

interest with the next year''s rent. If default is made even then, the property shall be surrendered to the lessor. Following the decisions in Naraina

Naikan v. Vasudeva Bhath ILR (1903) M. 389 and Narayana Kamti v. Handu Shetty (1901) M.L.J. 210 the defendant is not entitled to be

relieved against the forfeiture. It is, moreover, found that the tender in the suit was not of the whole amount due.

2.

We must reverse the decree of the District Judge and restore that of the Munsif with costs in this and the lower appellate Court.