High CourtsSingle Bench

Aditya Sinwar And Others vs Rohit Sharma

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 1 May 2024 · Citation: (2024) 05 RAJ CK 0001

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rekha Borana, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Civil Procedure, 1908 — Order 39 Rule 1, Order 39 Rule 2
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 1391 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 124 words

Rekha Borana, J

1.

Learned counsel for the appellants, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal with the submission that the learned trial Court be directed to decide the application under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2, CPC expeditiously.

2.

In view of the submission made, the permission as prayed for is granted. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

3.

Stay application stands disposed of.

4.

However, it is clear on record that reply to the application under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2, CPC itself has not been filed by the defendant-appellants till date. If the same is filed by the next date, learned trial Court is requested to decide the application under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2, CPC expeditiously.