High CourtsSingle Bench

Aegis Costumer Support Services Pvt Ltd vs Futuretimes Technology India Private Limited

Delhi High Court · Decided on 15 July 2021 · Citation: (2021) 07 DEL CK 0128

HON’BLE JUDGES
C. Hari Shankar, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 11(5), 11(6), 12(2)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Arbitration Petition No. 144 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

24 paragraphs · 372 words

C .Hari Shankar, J

ARB.P. 144/2021

1.

This is a petition under Sections 11(5) and 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“1996 Act†for short), for appointment of an

arbitrator to arbitrate on the disputes between the parties.

2.

The dispute, as set out in the petition, is contained in paras 1 to 24 thereof. As the respondent is not objecting to the appointment of an arbitrator to

arbitrate on the disputes, this Court is not burdening the order with a recital of the facts.

3.

The Arbitration Clause, in the agreement between the parties, reads thus:

“F. Governing Law & Arbitration

This LOE and all matters arising out of or related to this LOE shall be governed by the laws of India and courts at New Delhi shall have

exclusive jurisdiction over any matter of dispute arising under this LOE.

All disputes arising in relation to or pertaining to or under this LOE or any part thereof shall be resolved by a sole arbitrator mutually

agreed between the parties, in accordance with the provision of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 and amendments thereof The seat

of Arbitration shall be New Delhi and the language shall be English.â€​

4.

Notice invoking arbitration was sent by the petitioner to the respondent on 24th September, 2020, but could not be served. 30 days having elapsed

therefrom, the petitioner has moved this Court under Sections 11(5) and 11(6) of the 1996 Act.

5.

Ms. Raddhika Khanna, learned Counsel for the respondent, does not oppose reference of the disputes to arbitration. The claim is stated to be in the

vicinity of ₹ 2.6 crores, apart from interest.

6.

Accordingly, this Court appoints Mr. Ravi Kant Chadha, Senior Advocate, as the arbitrator to arbitrate on the disputes between the parties. The

contact details of the learned Arbitrator are as under:

Cell No. : 9811024601

E-mail ID Â : chadhaandassociates@rediffmail.com

7.

The learned Arbitrator shall file the requisite disclosure under Section 12(2) of the 1996 Act within a week of entering on reference.

8.

The learned Arbitrator shall be entitled to charge fees in accordance with the Fourth Schedule to the 1996 Act.

9.

With the aforesaid directions, this petition stands allowed and disposed of.