AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
8 paragraphs · 145 wordsRavindra Maithani, J
Applicant is in judicial custody in Case Crime No.141 of 2021, under Sections 419, 420, 468, 471, 120-B and 34 IPC and Section 66-D of the Information Technology Act, 2000, Police Station- Special Cell Delhi.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that co-accused, having similar role, has already been granted bail by this Court.
This fact is admitted by learned State Counsel.
Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.
The bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
