Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench

Aircel Ltd vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited

Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 2 May 2023 · Citation: (2023) 05 TDSAT CK 0003

HON’BLE JUDGES
Biresh Kumar, Registrar
CASE NUMBER
Telecom Petition No. 137, 613 Of 2015, 237, 260, 350 Of 2014, 346 Of 2013 With Misc Application No. 389 Of 2016
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 148 words
1.

A letter has been circulated on behalf of the Petitioner in T. P. No.346 of 2013 that since the witness is indisposed and unable to undertake travel, he could not appear in the Court today and, thus, a prayer for adjournment.

2.

It is needless to mention that the matter was earlier listed on 11.1.2023 when it was adjourned on a similar prayer. On 28.2.2023 also when the matter got adjourned with a direction to the Petitioner to produce his witness. Since the witness is not present today, the matter is adjourned with a direction to the Petitioner in T. P. No.346 of 2013 to produce witness on the date fixed. Let the matter be listed for "Evidence" on 1st August, 2023. Since date is fixed according to the preference of the Petitioners, further extension of time on behalf of the Petitioners shall be subject to cost.