AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
7 paragraphs · 384 wordsB.D. Rathi, J.—This revision petition has been preferred against the judgment dated 26.8.2013 passed by II Additional Sessions Judge, Sehore in Cr.A. No. 34/13 whereby the judgment dated 10.1.2013 passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sehore in Criminal Case No. 1041/2007 convicting the petitioner u/s 25(1B)(b) of the Arms Act (for short "the Act") and sentencing him to undergo R.I. for 1 year and to pay a fine of Rs. 100/-, was affirmed. Prosecution case, in brief, is that on 07/7/2007 the petitioner was arrested when he was roaming around in a cattle market with a Sword.
At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he does not want to challenge the conviction awarded to the petitioner. However, he prayed that the custodial sentence passed against the petitioner may be reduced to the period already undergone. According to him, the petitioner is in jail since 26/8/13.
In response, learned Government Advocate while making reference to the incriminating pieces of evidence on record, submitted that the conviction was well merited and the impugned judgment did not warrant interference.
Having regard to the arguments advanced by the parties, perused the judgments of the Courts below.
As the conviction is not under challenge, adverting to the question of sentence, it is apparent from the record that the incident took place, as early as, in the year 2007 and since then the petitioner has faced the prosecution and suffered the ordeal of trial and appeal for a considerable period of more than five years. Taking into consideration facts and circumstances of the case including the fact that petitioner has no criminal antecedents and on the date of incident he was aged about 30 years, in view of proviso appended to Section 25(1B) of the Act, interests of justice would be met if the term of custodial sentence is reduced to two months and fine amount is enhanced to Rs. 1000/-.
In view of the aforesaid, impugned conviction is maintained. However, the impugned term of custodial sentence is reduced to a period of 2 months while the fine amount is enhanced to Rs. 1000/- (Rupees One thousand only).
In the result, the revision stands allowed in part. Copy of the judgment be sent to the trial Court for information and compliance.
