High Courts

Ajaib Singh vs State of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 20 August 1991 · Citation: (1991) 3 RCR(Criminal) 518

HON’BLE JUDGES
H.S.Brar, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 8007-M of 1991
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 92 words

H.S. Brar, J.

1.

Mr. S.C. Chhabra says that the accusedpetitioner is in jail for the last about four years. Trial of the case is not proceeding as according to the prosecution, the statements of the prosecution witnesses can be recorded only after the statement of Dr. Mann is recorded, Dr. Mann has gone abroad and it has not been told as to when he can be available. In the peculiar circumstances of this case, I allow bail to the petitioner to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ferozepur.

JUDGMENT according.