AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
22 paragraphs · 411 wordsN.Anil Kumar, J
This Crl.M.C. is filed seeking to quash Annexure A final report and all further proceedings pursuant thereto in Crime No.2638/2017 of
Perumbavoor Police Station, which is now pending before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Perumbavoor against the petitioner as
C.C.No.556/2017.
The petitioner is an accused in Crime No.2638/2017 of Perumbavoor Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 341,323,324 and
294(b) of the Indian Penal Code. The above case was registered on the basis of a statement given by the second respondent before the Police. After
investigation, the Police filed final report in Crime No.2638/2017 of Perumbavoor Police Station, which is now pending before the Judicial First Class
Magistrate Court-I, Perumbavoor. The learned Magistrate took cognizance of the offences punishable under Sections 341,323, 324 and 294(b) of the
Indian Penal Code.3. The prosecution case in brief is that the petitioner, on 14.8.2017 at 11 am, assaulted the second respondent with a key at
Perumbavoor and thereby committed the aforesaid offences.
I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties and the learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the first respondent.
During the pendency of the proceedings, the entire dispute between the petitioner and second respondent had been settled. The second respondent
filed an affidavit before this Court stating that the entire dispute, which resulted in the registration of the above crime, had already been amicably
settled. The second respondent has no subsisting grievance against the petitioner.
 6. The dispute between the parties is purely private and personal in nature and no public policy as such is involved in the matter. The main
offences involved in this case are compoundable. When the offences being purely private and personal between the parties, the proceedings can be
quashed in the interest of justice on the basis of the settlement and in the light of the dictum laid down in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab [(2012)10 SCC
303], Narinder Singh and others v. State of Punjab and anothe r[(2014)6 SCC 466], Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai
Karmur and others v. State of Gujarat and another [(2017)9 SCC 641] and State of M.P. v. Laxmi Narayan and others [(2019)5 SCC 688].
 In the result, this Crl.M.C. stands allowed. Annexure- A Final Report and all further proceedings pursuant thereto in
Crime No.2638/2017 of Perumbavoor Police station, which is now pending before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Perumbavoor against the
petitioner as C.C.No.556/2017 stands quashed.
