High CourtsSingle Bench

Ajay Kishanlal Javat vs State Of Gujarat

Gujarat High Court · Decided on 1 April 2024 · Citation: (2024) 04 GUJ CK 0004

HON’BLE JUDGES
M. R. Mengdey, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
R/Criminal Misc.Application (For Regular Bail - After Chargesheet) No. 5473 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 694 words

M. R. Mengdey, J

1.

RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

2.

The present application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R.NO. 11191037230961 of 2023 registered with Odhav Police Station, Ahmedabad.

3.

Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

4.

Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed grant of regular bail, inter alia, contending that the applicant being a resident of State of Madhya Pradesh, in all likelihood, if the applicant is enlarged on bail, he would not be available for the purpose of trial. Moreover, the present applicant had played an active role in commission of offence in question. He, therefore, submitted to dismiss the present application.

5.

I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the papers. In present case, the investigation is over and charge-sheet has been filed. As per the case of prosecution, the present applicant had committed an rape upon the victim when she was present in her house. The clothes of the victim as well as present applicant have been sent to the F.S.L, which indicates presence of semen belonging to someone else on the clothes of the victim. The record also indicate that the victim was having an extra marital affairs with somebody else which had resulted into the murder of that person for which the victim has also been implicated as an accused.

6.

This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation, reported in [2012]1 SCC 40.

7.

In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the FIR, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.

8.

Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R.NO. 11191037230961 of 2023 registered with Odhav Police Station, Ahmedabad, on executing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall;

(a) not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

(b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution & shall not obstruct or hamper the police investigation and shall not to play mischief with the evidence collected or yet to be collected by the police;

(c) surrender passport, if any, to the Trial Court within a week;

(d) not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Trial Court concerned;

(e) mark presence before the concerned Police Station once in a month for a period of six months between 11.00 a.m. and 2.00 p.m.;

(f) furnish the present address of his residence to the Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of Trial Court;

9.

The authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.

10.

Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law.

11.

At the trial, the trial Court shall not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature qua the evidence at this stage made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail.

12.

Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted.