High CourtsSingle Bench

Ajay @ Raja Ram vs State

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 1 December 2021 · Citation: (2021) 12 RAJ CK 0001

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Garg, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 161 164, 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 376(2) · Protection Of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — Section 5, 6
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14681 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 190 words

Manoj Kumar Garg, J

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.189/2021, Police Station Ladnun, District Nagaur for the offence punishable under Section 376(2) of Indian Penal Code and Section 5/6 POCSO Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that F.I.R. in this case has been lodged after considerable delay and this delay has not been explained by the prosecutrix. Learned counsel further submits that there are material contradictions in the statement of the prosecutrix recorded under Section 161 & 164 Cr.P.C. Challan of the case has already been presented. In these circumstances, the petitioner may be released on bail.

Per contra, Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

I have considered the arguments advanced before me and carefully gone through the material available on record.

There are specific allegation against the petitioner. No case for grant of bail is made out.

Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application is dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file bail application afresh after recording the statement of the prosecutrix.