High CourtsSingle Bench

Ajay @ Sintu vs State Of Rajasthan And Others

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 1 August 2023 · Citation: (2023) 08 RAJ CK 0003

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Garg, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Scheduled Caste And Scheduled Tribe (Prevention Of Atrocities) Act, 1989 — Section 3(1)(w)(i), 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(1)(w), 14A(2) · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 354D, 376(2)(n), 452, 506, 509 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Appeal No. 423 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 336 words

Manoj Kumar Garg, J

The instant appeal has been filed under Section 14-A(2) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, on behalf of the appellant, who is in custody in connection with FIR No.55/2023, Police Station Badliyas, District Bhilwara, for the offence under Sections 452, 376(2)(n), 506, 509, 354D of IPC and Sections 3(1)(w)(i), 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(1)(w) of SC/ST Act against the order dated 29.03.2023 passed by learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Bhilwara whereby, the bail application preferred under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the appellant was rejected.

Counsel for the appellant submits that the prosecutrix has been examined in court as PW-1 and she has been declared hostile. The accused-appellant is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Counsel further submits that the learned court below has grossly erred in law and facts as well in declining to release the appellant on bail. Therefore, it is prayed that the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-appellant.

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

Having regard to the entirety of facts and circumstances as available on record and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced at the bar, this Court is of the opinion that the order rejecting the application for bail filed on behalf of the appellant, cannot be sustained and deserves to be set aside.

Consequently, the instant appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated 29.03.2023 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Bhilwara is set aside. It is ordered that the accused-appellant Ajay @ Sintu S/o Kalu Lal, arrested in connection with FIR No.55/2023, Police Station Badliyas, District Bhilwara, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- and two surety bonds of Rs. 50,000/-each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.