High CourtsSingle Bench

Ajith Kumar vs Narayanan

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 23 May 2022 · Citation: (2022) 05 KL CK 0110

HON’BLE JUDGES
A. Badharudeen, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 227
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Original Petition (C) No. 799 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 142 words

A. Badharudeen, J.

1.

In this Original Petition filed under under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, who is the judgment debtor in E.P.No.234/2019 in O.S.No.1157/2017 on the file of Munsiff Court, Ernakulam, sought permission to deposit the decree debt as a whole before the Munsiff Court, Ernakulam, during summer vacation. However, notice was issued to the other side.

2.

Since vacation is over and the Munsiff Court, Ernakulam, started regular sitting, the grievance of the petitioner in this Original Petition is of no much significance.

3.

Advocate Resmi Nandanan appeared for the respondent/decree holder.

This Original Petition is accordingly disposed of directing the petitioner to deposit the decree debt as offered within 3 days before the execution court and balance, if any, shall be decided by the execution court in the execution proceedings pending, after hearing both sides.