High CourtsSingle Bench

Akash @ Akku vs State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 8 April 2026 · Citation: (2026) 04 MP CK 0258

HON’BLE JUDGES
Subodh Abhyankar, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Section 183, 483 · Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — Section 64(1), 64(2), 87, 137(2) · Protection Of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — Section 3, 4, 5L, 6 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 437(3)
RESULT
Allowed/ Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 12708 Of 2026
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 427 words

Subodh Abhyankar, J

1] They are heard. Perused the case diary/challan papers.

2] This is the applicant's first bail application filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ 439 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, as he / she is implicated in connection with Crime No.159/2025 registered at Police Station Balwada, District Khargone (MP) for offence punishable under Sections 137(2),87,64(1) and 64(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3,4,5L/6 of POCSO Act. The applicant is in custody since 9.1.2026

3] Allegation against the applicant is of abduction and rape.

4] Counsel for the applicant has submitted that the prosecutrix was a consenting party, which is also apparent from her statement recorded under section 183 of the BNSS, wherein she has clearly given a clean chit to the applicant. Copy of the statement of the prosecutrix is filed on record. It is further submitted that the age of the prosecutrix is also disputed. It is also submitted that the applicant is lodged in jail since 9.1.2026 and the final conclusion of trial is likely to take sufficient long time. Hence, it is submitted that the bail application be allowed and he be released on bail.

5] Counsel for the respondent / State, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer.

6] Having considered the rival submissions, perusal of the case diary as also the documents filed on record, and considering the fact that the final conclusion of the trial is likely to take sufficient long time and the age of the prosecutrix is also disputed, in the considered opinion of this Court, the applicant's application deserves to be allowed.

7] Accordingly, without commenting on the merits of the case, the application filed by the applicant is allowed. The applicant is directed to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/-(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his/her regular appearance before the trial Court during trial with a condition that he / she shall remain present before the court concerned during trial and shall also abide by the conditions enumerated under Section 437 (3) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. It is also directed that if the applicant is found to be involved in violation of any of the terms of this order, an application for cancellation of his bail may be filed before the Trial Court itself, who shall decide the same in accordance with law.

8] M.Cr.C. stands allowed and disposed of.

Certified copy as per rules.