High CourtsSingle Bench

Akash Gautam And Another vs State Of Punjab And Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 8 July 2022 · Citation: (2022) 07 P&H CK 0026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anoop Chitkara, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 25412 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 124 words

Anoop Chitkara, J

Notice served upon the official respondents through the State counsel. Prayer in the present petition is for directing the official respondents No.1 to 3 to decide the representation (Annexure P-6)

The prayer being innocuous is not opposed.

Given above, respondent No.2-Director General of Police Punjab, Civil Secretariat, Sector 9, Chandigarh, to decide the representation (P-6) himself or delegate to any other officer not below the rank of an IPS Officer, by passing a speaking and reasoned order within thirty working days from today.

In case, the grievance of the petitioners still exists, liberty is reserved to avail legal remedy in accordance with law including approaching this Court.

Petition is allowed to the extent above. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.