High CourtsSingle Bench

Akhil vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 1 December 2023 · Citation: (2023) 12 KL CK 0008

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr. Kauser Edappagath, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 20(b)II(A), 22(c), 29, 37, 50
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No.10050 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 695 words

Dr. Kauser Edappagath, J

1.

This application is filed u/s 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking regular bail.

2.

The applicant is the accused No.2 in Crime No.25 /2023 of Excise Enforcement and Anti Narcotic Special Squad, Palakkad. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 20(b) II (A), 22(c) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

3.

The prosecution case, in short, is that on 25.05.2023 at around 03.10 p.m, at platform No.3 of the railway station, Palakkad, the applicant, along with the accused No.1, were found in possession of Hashish 50.85 grams, Charas 8.65 grams and LSD 0.500 grams and thereby, the applicant committed the offences.

4.

I have heard Sri.P. Muhammed Sabah, the learned counsel for the applicant and Smt.Nima Jacob, the learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to get bail. On the other hand, the learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant, and he is not entitled to bail at this stage.

6.

The applicant was remanded to judicial custody on 25.05.2023 and the investigation is practically over. A reading of the mazahar would show that, at the time of the seizure, the applicant and the accused No.1 were standing on the railway platform. The detecting officer found the accused No.1 handing over a packet to the applicant. On inspection, it was found that it contained Hashish weighing 50.85 grams. Thereafter, the body search of both the applicant and the accused No.1, were conducted in the presence of a Gazetted Officer, complying with Section 50 of the NDPS Act. On such body search, Charas weighing 8.65 grams was recovered from the body of the applicant and LSD weighing 0.500 grams was also recovered from the body of the accused No.1. The railway ticket from New Delhi to Ernakulam Junction was also seized from the possession of the accused No.1. Thus, what was seized from the possession of the applicant is Hashish weighing 50.85 grams and Charas weighing 8.65 grams only. Both of them are small quantities. What was seized from the accused No.1 is LSD weighing 0.500 grams, which is commercial quantity. Apart from the fact that the applicant and the accused No.1 were found together on the platform, there is nothing on record to show the involvement of the applicant so far as the LSD seized from the possession of the accused No.1 is concerned. Hence, the rigour of Section 37 of the NDPS Act would not be attributed to the applicant. For all these reasons, I do not find any reason to hold that the continued detention of the applicant is required for any purpose. Hence, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions: -

(i) The applicant shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Magistrate/Court.

(ii) The applicant shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

(iii) The applicant shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m. on every Saturday until further orders. He shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of the bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.