AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
5 paragraphs · 153 wordsHeard the learned Counsel for the parties.
The petitioner has challenged the detention order dated 2492001 passed under Section 3(2) of the N.S.A., copy of which has been filed as Annexure1 to the writ petition. A perusal of the grounds of detention shows that on 2582001 at about 255 p.m. the petitioner and his two associates attacked one Jisan and others.
Petitioner''s associates Faim and Atuallah fired gunshots due to which Jisan died on the spot.
In our opinion this is only a case of law and order and not public order as held by the Hon''ble Supreme Court in the case of ''T. Devaki v. Government of Tamil Nadu and others, 1990 SCC (Cri.) 348''.
Following the decision of the Hon''ble Supreme Court, the writ petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to release the petitioner forthwith unless wanted in any other criminal or preventive detention case.
