AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
11 paragraphs · 384 wordsAlok Kumar Verma, J
This bail application has been filed for grant of regular bail in connection with the First Information Report No.264 of 2022, registered with Police Station Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar for the offence under Sections 8/21/29/60 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as, “the Act, 1985”).
On 28.04.2022 at around 15.35 hrs., the informant Sub Inspector Harvindar Singh along with other police personnel were busy in checking of vehicles. The present applicant was apprehended and 42.74 g.m. smack was recovered from his personal search in the presence of the Circle Officer of Police.
Heard Mr. Tarun Pandey, the learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. T.C. Agarwal, the learned Deputy Advocate General for the State.
The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant has been implicated in this matter; nothing was recovered from his possession; the provisions of Section 50 were not followed; the applicant has no criminal history and is in custody since 28.04.2022.
The learned counsel for the State opposed the bail application.
As per Table prepared in terms of Section 2(xxiii-a) and Section 2(vii-a) of the said Act, 1985, 5 g.m. of smack is small quantity and greater than 250 gram is the commercial quantity (Entry No.56); the alleged recovered contraband was non-commercial.
Bail is the rule and committal to jail is an exception. Refusal of bail is a restriction on the personal liberty of the individual, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The object of keeping the accused person in detention during the investigation is not punishment. The main purpose is manifestly to secure the attendance of the accused.
Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for both the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case, there is no reason to keep the applicant behind the bars for an indefinite period, therefore, without expressing any opinion as to the merit of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage.
The bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant-Aleem be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
