High CourtsSingle Bench

Almora Urban Co Operative Bank Ltd vs District Magistrate And Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 22 May 2026 · Citation: (2026) 05 UK CK 1179

HON’BLE JUDGES
Pankaj Purohit, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002 — Section 14
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition Miscellaneous Single No. 1475 Of 2026
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 492 words

Pankaj Purohit, J

1.

Petitioner has moved this writ petition seeking for a direction in the nature of mandamus to the respondent no.1 to decide the application dated 07.01.2025 titled as Almora Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs. M/s Aarna Associates & others (Annexure-3 to the writ petition) and to complete the task of handing over the physical possession of the secured asset as well as documents of the secured asset to the petitioner Bank expeditiously within a shortest period prescribed by this Court.

2.

An innocuous prayer has been made by learned counsel for petitioner to this Court seeking a direction to the respondent no.1 to decide the said application within stipulated period.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner draw the attention of this Court to proviso to Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, wherein, it is provided that after being satisfied with contents of the affidavits, the District Magistrate or the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate may pass suitable orders for the purpose of taking possession of the secured assets within a period of thirty days from the date of application and further proviso provides that the District Magistrate/Chief Metropolitan Magistrate may decide such application for a further period, recording the reasons in writing for the same, and pass the order within such further period but not exceeding in aggregate sixty days.

4.

He further submitted that the case of petitioner is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 16.02.2026 passed by this Court in WPMS No.340 of 2026 India Shelter Finance Corporation Vs. Chief Judicial Magistrate and Others, reported in 2026 SCC Online Utt 390 whereby, the said writ petition was disposed of with a direction to respondent no.1 to decide the application of petitioner within a period of thirty days from the date of production of a certified copy of that order i.e. 16.02.2026, strictly in accordance with law.

5.

Learned State Counsel does not dispute the said fact that the matter is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 16.02.2026 passed by this Court in WPMS No.340 of 2026 India Shelter Finance Corporation Vs. Chief Judicial Magistrate and Others.

6.

I have perused the proviso to Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 and find that the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner are correct. The application has been pending since 07.01.2025 before the District Magistrate.

7.

In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of, in terms of judgment and order dated 16.02.2026 passed by this Court in WPMS No.340 of 2026 India Shelter Finance Corporation Vs. Chief Judicial Magistrate and Others. Respondent no.1 is directed to decide the application dated 07.01.2025 titled as Almora Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs. M/s Aarna Associates & others (Annexure-3 to the writ petition), within a period of thirty days from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, strictly in accordance with law.

8.

Pending application, if any, stands disposed of accordingly.