AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
5 paragraphs · 234 wordsManoj Kumar Garg, J
The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.313/2022 of Police Station Ratanada, District Jodhpur, for the offence punishable under Sections 384, 120-B of IPC. They have preferred these bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
Learned counsels for the petitioners submit that offences are triable by the magistrate. The accused-petitioners are behind the bar and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioners.
Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail applications. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
Accordingly, both the bail applications filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. are allowed and it is directed that petitioners (1) Alok Kumar S/o Kali Kant, (2) Hadaynarayan S/o Parmeshwar & (3) Shashi Kumar S/o Indra Dev, shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.313/2022 of Police Station Ratanada, District Jodhpur, provided they execute personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- each with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.