High CourtsDivision Bench

Altaf Ali vs Nur Ahmad

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 18 November 1878 · Citation: (1880) ILR (All) 58

HON’BLE JUDGES
Turner, J · Pearson, J
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 142 words
1.

Under the provisions of Section 240 of Act VIII of 1859, a private alienation of property made after its attachment had been duly intimated and made known in the manner prescribed by the Act is declared null and void. It is not shown that the attachment in this case was made known as by the Act directed. It is not proved that a copy of the order was posted in a conspicuous part, or in any part, of the Court-house, nor that it was sent to or posted in the office of the Collector. We are therefore unable to find that the alienation was made after the attachment had been made known as by the Act prescribed, and consequently the provisions of Section 240 do not apply,--Indra Chandra v. The Agra and Masternan''s Bank 10 WR 264 : SC 1 BLRSN