AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
11 paragraphs · 203 wordsV. Narasingh, J
1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The Petitioner is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with G.R. Case No.2204 of 2024 pending on the file of learned S.D.J.M., Angul, arising out of Angul P.S. Case No.984 of 2024 for commission of offences punishable under Sections 303(2) of BNS.
Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer.
Taking into account the nature of allegation and the submissions made, this Court directs that on surrendering within three weeks hence and moving for bail, the Petitioner shall be released on bail by the learned Court in seisin on such terms as deemed just and proper subject to verification of criminal antecedent of similar nature.
If it comes to the fore that the Petitioner has any such criminal antecedent, this order shall not be given effect to.
Before releasing the learned Court shall verify as to whether order of this Court has been assailed before the Apex Court and if so, the result thereof.
It is needless to state that the Petitioner shall cooperate with the ongoing investigation.
Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of.
U.C.C. as per rules.
…………………………..
