High CourtsSingle Bench

Amaan vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 5 March 2025 · Citation: (2025) 03 UK CK 0803

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Maithani, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — Section 115(2), 118(2), 351(3)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Second Bail Application No. 296 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 140 words

Ravindra Maithani, J

1.

Applicant is in judicial custody in Case Crime No. 225 of 2024, under Section 115 (2), 118 (2), 351 (3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Vikasnagar, District Dehradun. He has sought his release on bail.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3.

It is argued that the co-accused having similar role has already been granted bail.

4.

This fact is admitted by learned State counsel.

5.

Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

6.

The bail application is allowed.

7.

Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.