High CourtsDivision Bench

Amar Singh vs Namrata Vrishni And Others

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 11 November 2022 · Citation: (2022) 11 RAJ CK 0039

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sandeep Mehta, J · Kuldeep Mathur, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
D.B. Writ Contempt No. 475 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 283 words

The petitioner has filed the instant contempt application raising a grievance that the direction given by this Court vide order dated 02.08.2021 passed in writ petition (PIL) No.9263/2021 filed by the petitioner to remove encroachments existing on the land of Khasra Nos.219, 220 and 221 of Village Bagawas, Patwar Halka Lunawas, Tehsil Bagora, District Jalore has not been complied with.

Shri Sunil Beniwal, AAG has filed a compliance report on record wherein it is indicated that the land of Khasra No.219, admeasuring 1.64 hectares was recorded as Gair Mumkin Gochar whereas khasra No.221 admeasuring 8.20 hectares was recorded as Barani-I, (Gochar) land in the revenue record.

An enquiry was conducted pursuant to the said direction and as many as 19 encroachments were noticed on land of Khasra No.220. No encroachments were noticed on Khasra Nos.219 & 221. Eleven encroachments have already been removed from the land in question. One of the encroachers has procured a stay order and in another case, direction to maintain status quo has been passed. Five encroachers namely Jaga Bharti, Bhola Bharti, Adra Bharti, Hadmata, and Jamat Bharti who have encroached on the land of Khasra No.220 which is of Barani category are landless persons and thus, the Panchayat has drawn a proposal to regularize their possession under the Scheme of State Government.

Apparently thus, we are satisfied that there are no encroachments on prohibited category of land. The proposal to regularize the possession/dwelling houses of the five encroachers, referred to supra, has been taken in light of the State Government’s policy and hence, the authorities are not liable to be punished for willful disobedience of this Court’s order.

Consequently, the contempt petition is disposed of. Rule is discharged.