High CourtsDivision Bench

Amara Ram vs State Of Rajasthan And Others

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 25 April 2022 · Citation: (2022) 04 RAJ CK 0101

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sandeep Mehta, J · Vinod Kumar Bharwani, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 97 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 150 words

The corpus Mst. ‘P’ has been produced in the Court by Shri Pannaram, ASI, Police Station Shergarh, District Jodhpur. We conferred with her ‘in Camera’. With full confidence at her command, she stated that she was being harassed and humiliated in the matrimonial home and thus, she is voluntarily living at her father’s house in the village Bapu Nagar and is not illegally confined.

In the facts noted herein above, we hereby direct that the corpus shall be safely escorted to her father’s house. The peremptory cost of Rs.20,000/- deposited by the petitioner shall be paid to the corpus by way of litigation expenses and the same shall be deposited in the bank account of her father Shri Champa Ram. The account details of Shri Champa Ram shall be provided by Shri Joshi in the registry within next three days.

The habeas corpus petition is disposed of. Rule is discharged.