High CourtsSingle Bench

Amardeepsinh Mahavirsinh Vaghela vs State Of Gujarat

Gujarat High Court · Decided on 18 February 2020 · Citation: (2020) 02 GUJ CK 0041

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.H.Vora, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
R/Criminal Misc. Application No. 3648 Of 2020

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

24 paragraphs · 412 words

S.H.Vora, J

1.

Learned advocate Mr. Jitendra Kotai states that he has instructions to appear for respondent No.2 â€" complainant. He is permitted to file his

Vakalatnama. He has produced affidavit of of the complainant and who is power of attorney holder of Mr. Rameshkumar Gordhandas Bhatia, which

is ordered to be taken on record. Learned advocate Mr. Jitendra Kotai has also produced MOU of the complainant and Mr. Rameshkumar

Gordhandas Bhatia, which is ordered to be taken on record.

2.

Respondent no.2 â€" Sharadbhai Bhatia is present before the Court and admits correctness and genuineness of the affidavit filed by him through his

learned advocate. Learned advocate Mr.Jitendra Kotai identifies respondent no.2 and confirms correctness and genuineness of the affidavit filed by

him.

3.

Rule. Learned A.P.P. and learned advocate Mr.Jitendra Kotai waive service of Rule for respondent Nos.1 and 2 respectively. Learned APP

objects quashment of present proceedings on the premise of settlement.

4.

With the consent of learned advocate for the applicant and learned advocate for respondents, present application is taken up for final disposal today.

5.

By way of the present application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, the ‘Code’), the applicant pray for

quashing and setting aside the F.I.R. being C.R.No.138/2020 (11993003200098) registered with Anjar Police Station, Kachchh for the offence

punishable under Sections 465, 468, 471 and 120B of IPC.

6.

Learned advocate for the applicant has taken this Court through the factual matrix arising out of the present application.

7.

At the outset, it is submitted that the parties have amicably resolved the dispute. In support of such submission made at bar by the learned

advocates appearing for the respective parties, they have placed on record affidavit of settlement of dispute duly signed by the respondent No.2 â€

complainant.

8.

Since now, the dispute with reference to the impugned F.I.R. is settled and resolved by and between parties which is confirmed by the original

complainant through his learned advocate, the trial would be futile and any further continuation of proceedings would amount to abuse of process of

law. Therefore, the impugned F.I.R. is required to be quashed and set aside.

9.

Resultantly, this application is allowed. Impugned F.I.R. being C.R.No.138/2020 (11993003200098) registered with Anjar Police Station, Kachchh

and all other consequential proceedings arising out of said FIR are hereby quashed and set aside qua the applicant only. Rule is made absolute to the

aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted.