High CourtsSingle Bench(2010) 12 UK CK 0190

Amarpal Singh, Harmeet Singh and Inderjeet Singh vs State of Uttarakhand and Jaspal Singh

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 13 December 2010

HON’BLE JUDGES
Prafulla C. Pant, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Application (C-482) No. 660 and Miscellaneous Application No. 4396 of 2010

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 406 words

Prafulla C. Pant, J.—By means of this petition, moved u/s 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (for short of Cr.P.C), the Petitioners have sought quashing of the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 4829 of 2009 State v. Amarpal Singh and Ors. relating to offences punishable u/s 380, 506 I.P.C, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dehradun.

2.

Heard learned Counsel for the parties and perused the affidavit, counter affidavit and rejoinder affidavit.

3.

Brief facts of the case are that the Petitioner and the complainants are related to each other, and belong to Ayurvedic practitioners family. There had been some dispute between them, as to the property inherited by them. In the First Information Report lodged on behalf of the complainant it is alleged that on 20th of July 2009, the accused entered in the shop of complainant, in his possession, and occupied it in the night. It is further alleged that the accused had taken away the movable property of the complainant from the shop in question, after investigation the police submitted charge sheet.

4.

Learned Counsel for the Petitioners 3 submitted that a civil suit is already pending between the parties before the District Judge, Delhi. It is alleged that the First Information Report is subsequent to the suit filed on behalf of the Petitioner Amarpal Singh against the complainant Jaspal Singh. Copy of the plaint shows that it has been prayed in the suit before the Delhi court, that receiver be appointed in respect of the property in dispute.

5.

Since, it requires appreciation of evidence to come to the conclusion whether, the offence as alleged by the complainant has been made out or not. It is not desirable on the part of this Court to enter into such kind of disputed fact in its jurisdiction u/s 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure It is for the trial court to examine the issue after recording the evidence.

6.

Therefore, without expressing any opinion as to final merits of the case, pending before the trial court, this petition u/s 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, is dismissed, with the observation that if the Petitioners Amarpal Singh, Harmeet Singh and Inderjeet Singh, surrender before the court concerned, their bail application shall be heard and disposed of without unreasonable delay. It is open for the Petitioners to raise the plea before trial court that the dispute between the parties is of civil nature.