High CourtsSingle Bench

Ameer vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 20 November 2020 · Citation: (2020) 11 KL CK 0043

HON’BLE JUDGES
P.V. Kunhikrishnan, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 323, 324, 325, 326
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 7351 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

37 paragraphs · 702 words
1.

This Bail Application filed under Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code was heard through Video Conference.

2.

The Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.933/2020 of Cherpu Police Station, Thrissur District. The above case is registered against the petitioner

alleging offences punishable under Sections 323,324,325 and 326 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

3.

The prosecution case is that, on 07.10.2020 at 08:00 p.m the petitioner along with other accused , in furtherance of their common intention,

voluntarily caused hurt to the defacto complainant by beating him with an iron rod and bricks. Hence, it is alleged that the accused committed the

offence.

4.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

5.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, the incident is not happened as alleged by the prosecution. The learned counsel for the

petitioner submitted that, even if the statement of the victim is accepted all these incidents happened in a spur of moment. The offence under Section

326 of IPC is not attracted in this case. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, the petitioner surrendered before the Investigating

Officer on 17.10.2020. He is in custody from that date onwards. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, the petitioner is ready to abide

any conditions, if this Court grants him bail.

6.

The learned Public Prosecutor seriously opposed the bail application. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that, the petitioner is involved in three

other cases. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that, the offences alleged against the petitioner are very serious.

7.

After hearing both sides, I think, this bail application can be allowed on stringent conditions. The petitioner is in custody from 17.10.2020 onwards.

The other cases registered against the petitioner are all with minor offences. Moreover, the petitioner is in custody from 17.10.2020. Considering the

entire facts and circumstances of the case, I think, this bail application can be allowed on stringent conditions.

8.

Moreover, considering the need to follow social distancing norms inside prisons so as to avert the spread of the novel Corona Virus Pandemic, the

Hon'ble Supreme Court in Re: Contagion of COVID-19 Virus In Prisons case (Suo Motu Writ Petition(C) No.1 of 2020) and a Full Bench of this

Court in W.P(C)No.9400 of 2020 issued various salutary directions for minimizing the number of inmates inside prisons.

9.

Moreover, it is a well accepted principle that, the bail is the rule and the jail is the exception. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Chidambaram P. v.

Directorate of Enforcement (2019 (16) SCALE 870), after considering all the earlier judgments, observed that, the basic jurisprudence relating to bail

remains the same inasmuch as the grant of bail is the rule and refusal is the exception so as to ensure that the accused has the opportunity of securing

fair trial.

10.

Considering the dictum laid down in the above decision and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this Bail Application is allowed

with the following directions:

1.

The petitioner shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like

sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court;

2.

The petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer for interrogation as and when required. The petitioner shall co-operate with the

investigation and shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to

dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

3.

The petitioner shall not leave India without permission of the jurisdictional Court;

4.

The petitioner shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected;

5.

The petitioner shall strictly abide by the various guidelines issued by the State Government and Central Government with respect to keeping of

social distancing in the wake of Covid 19 pandemic;

6.

If any of the above conditions are violated by the petitioner, the jurisdictional Court can cancel the bail in accordance to law, even though the bail is

granted by this Court.