AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
Gita Mittal, J
This writ petition seeks issuance of a writ to quash the metro fares recommended by the Fare Fixation Committee, constituted under the provision
of Section 34 of the Delhi Metro Rail (Operation & Maintenance) Act, 2002. There is no dispute that the metro rail has enforced the
recommendations. The petitioner has sought directions to the DMRC to re-evaluate the fares on the basis of introducing more distance zones
complaining that the fixation is arbitrary and discriminatory.
Given the fact that the DMRC has implemented the recommendations of a statutorily appointed committee, we are not inclined to entertain this writ
petition. Furthermore, the writ petition urges questions of fact regarding the distance and fares which an expert committee has assessed and this court
does not have the jurisdiction to go into such intricate questions of fact. It is more important to know that the writ petitioner has filed this writ petition
without making any representation to the respondents.
In view thereof, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to treat the writ petition as a representation and to take a view
thereon.
Dasti to parties.
