High CourtsSingle Bench

Amit Kumar vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 22 August 2024 · Citation: (2024) 08 UK CK 0141

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Maithani, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 380, 411, 420, 454
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Second Bail Application No. 197 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 166 words

Ravindra Maithani, J

1.

Applicant is in judicial custody in Case Crime No.274 of 2023, under Sections 380, 411, 420, 454 & 34 IPC, Police Station Doiwala, District Dehradun. He has sought his release on bail.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3.

It is argued that this is the second bail application of the applicant. The first bail application has been rejected on merits on 16.05.2024.

4.

Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that after rejection of the first bail application of the applicant, one of the co-accused having similar role has already been enlarged on bail.

5.

Learned State Counsel admits this fact.

6.

Having considered, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

7.

The bail application is allowed.

8.

Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.