AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
23 paragraphs · 410 wordsSubodh Abhyankar, J
This is the first application under Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, as he is implicated in connection with Crime No.371/2021 registered
at Police Station Mahakal, District Ujjain (MP) for offence punishable under Sections 8/20 of N.D.P.S. Act.
The applicant is in custody since 06.05.2021.
The allegation against the applicant is that from his possession 2 kg cannabis (Ganja) has been seized, which is far less-than the commercial quantity,
which is 20 kg and the minimum quantity is 1kg.
Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is in custody since 6.5.2021 and there are no criminal antecedents against him. Final conclusion of
trial is likely to take sufficient long time. Therefore, he be granted bail.
Counsel for the respondent/State, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer.
Having considered rival submissions and considering the fact that the quantity is far less than the commercial quantity and the Courts are not
functioning now a days on account of Covid-19 and the applicant is in custody since 06.05.2021, this Court finds it expedient to allow the present bail
application.
Accordingly, without commenting on the merits of the case, the application filed by the applicant is allowed. The applicant is directed to be released on
bail upon furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (rupees fifty thousand) with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of
the trial Court for his regular appearance before the trial Court during trial with a condition that he shall remain present before the court concerned
during trial and shall also abide by the conditions enumerated under Section 437 (3) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.
However, the Trial Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedents of the applicant at the time of furnishing the bail before allowing him bail and if
it is found that other cases under the NDPS Act are also registered against him, then this order shall be deemed cancelled without further reference to
this Court.
It is also observed that if the applicant is found to be involved in any criminal activities, after his release on bail, then the present bail order shall stand
cancelled without further reference to this Court; and the State / prosecution will be free to arrest the accused in the present case also.
This order shall be effective till the end of the trial, however, in case of bail jump, it shall become ineffective.
Certified copy as per rules.
