High CourtsDivision Bench

Amrit Lal vs Shromani Gurudwara Parbandhak Committee

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 6 May 2016 · Citation: (2016) 4 PLR 190

HON’BLE JUDGES
Mr. S.S. Saron and Mr. Gurmit Ram, JJ.
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 226
RESULT
Disposed Off
CASE NUMBER
CWP No. 4955 of 2016
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 458 words

Mr. S.S. Saron, J.—Affidavit of Mr. Amrit Lal, petitioner has been filed. It is stated that petition has been field in his personal capacity and he has incurred the expenses for the same. The petitioner is a member of Amritsar Anti-Corruption & Welfare Society and he has referred to his Membership of the aforesaid Society to prove his credentials.

2.

It is stated that petitioner was upset at the plight of the cancer patients, being treated in Sri Guru Ram Dass Charitable Hospital Trust-respondent No.2. Poor cancer patients get cashless treatment upto a limit of Rs. 1.50 lacs under the Punjab Government Scheme, any amount above the said limit has to be incurred by the patient himself. A poor cancer patient, who get cashless treatment up to Rs. 1.50 lacs, in fact gets the benefit of medicines worth Rs. 75,000/- only in the absence of any discount being offered by the chemist shops located within Sri Guru Ram Dass Charitable Hospital Trust-respondent No.2 .

3.

The petition has been filed for directing the respondents to incorporate a provision for payment of maximum discount to the consumers/patients, while conducting the open auction of four medical stores in Sri Guru Ram Dass Charitable Hospital Trust-respondent No.2, inter alia on the ground that the Charitable Hospital is owned by a Trust which is controlled by Shriomani Gurudwara Parbandhak Committee, Sri Amritsar Sahib-respondent No.1 and such charitable trust must show consideration to the patients/consumers by making a provision for grant of maximum discount to the patients/consumers who purchase medicines from Sri Guru Ram Dass Charitable Hospital Trust-respondent No.2. Besides, various other prominent hospitals in the State of Punjab are providing such discounts for the purchase of medicines. The details of which are mentioned.

4.

The grievance of the petitioner is that Sri Guru Ram Dass Charitable Hospital Trust-respondent No.2 is not providing any discount to the patients/consumers, whereas other prominent hospitals in the State of Punjab are providing similar discounts. Therefore, it is prayed that a mandamus be issued to them.

5.

After giving our thoughtful consideration to the matter, it may be noticed that though the case of the petitioner may be well-founded, however, this Court in exercise of its writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India cannot issue a mandamus for providing discounts on medicines. However, Sri Guru Ram Dass Charitable Hospital Trust-respondent No.2 is requested to itself to consider whether such discounts are to be given or not.

6.

In the circumstances the present petition is disposed of with a request to Sri Guru Ram Dass Charitable Hospital Trust-respondent No.2 to consider the grievance of the petitioner for providing necessary discounts. A copy of petition along with its Annexures be sent to it for necessary action.