High CourtsSingle Bench

Amrit Pal Singh vs State of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 20 May 2011 · Citation: (2011) 05 P&H CK 0056

HON’BLE JUDGES
Alok Singh, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 34, 420
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
CRM No. M-1625 of 2010 (O and M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 148 words

Alok Singh, J.—This is an application seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 852 dated 25.11.2009 under Sections 420/34 IPC, Police

Station Kotwali Bathinda, District Bathinda.

2.

This Court vide order dated 5.4.2011 has directed to release the Petitioner on interim bail.

3.

Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that Petitioner has already been released on bail and the Petitioner has joined the investigation and shall

join the investigation as and when asked to do so by the Investigating Officer.

4.

Mr. K.D. Sachdeva, learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab, on instructions from HC Davinder Singh, who is personally present in

Court, states that Petitioner is co-operating in the investigation and custodial interrogation is not required.

5.

Learned Counsel appearing for the complainant has vehemently opposed the bail application.

6.

Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, petition is allowed. Order dated 5.4.2011 is made absolute.