High CourtsSingle Bench(2011) 06 P&H CK 0040

Amritpal Kaur vs State of Punjab and Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 1 June 2011

HON’BLE JUDGES
Surya Kant, J
CASE NUMBER
Civl Writ Petition No. 10018 of 2011

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 162 words

Surya Kant, J.—Notice of motion.

2.

Mr.J.S. Puri, learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the Respondents.

3.

In view of the nature of order which I propose to pass, there is no need to seek any counter-reply from the Respondents at this stage.

4.

The Petitioner, who is a retired S.S. Mistress from the Education Department, Government of Punjab, seeks a mandamus to count the service rendered by her in the Government Aided Private School towards ''qualifying service'' for the purpose of pensionary benefits.

5.

During the course of hearing, learned Counsel for the parties are ad-idem that the controversy involved in this case stands settled by a decision dated 10.03.2010 rendered by this Court in Civil Writ Petition No. 14238 of 1991 Sukhdev Singh and Ors. v. State of Punjab and others (Annexure P-4).

6.

The present writ petition is accordingly disposed of in terms of the afore-stated order dated 10.03.2010 passed in Sukhdev Singh''s case (supra).