High CourtsSingle Bench

Anil vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 24 January 2020 · Citation: (2020) 01 MP CK 0076

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.K. Awasthi, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 437(3) , 439 · Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, 1915 — Section 34(2)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 1203 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 421 words

They are heard. Perused the case diary / challan papers.

This first application under Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 has been filed by applicant, who is implicated in connection with Crime No.597/2019 registered at Police Station Dwarkapuri, Indore District Indore (MP) for offence punishable under Section 34 (2) of the Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, 1915.

The applicant is in custody since 30.12.2019.

As per prosecution story, on the basis of source information, 75 bulk liters of liquor has been seized from Angregi Sharab Aahata, Dwarkapuri, Indore; and the present case has been registered against the applicant.

Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is youth aged about 29 years; and is not having any criminal record. No liquor has been recovered from the possession of the applicant. 75 bulk liters of illegal liquor alleged to have been recovered from English Wine Aahata, Dwarkapuri, District Indore. Although it is alleged that the applicant is the owner of the aforesaid premises, however, there is no evidence available on record to substantiate the aforesaid fact. The applicant is in custody since 30.12.2019. The investigation is almost complete and the applicant is not required for further interrogation. There is no possibility of his absconsion or tempering the evidence, if enlarged on bail. The offence registered against the applicant is triable by Judicial Magistrate First Class. Conclusion of the trial will take sufficiently long time. Under these circumstances, learned counsel for the applicant prays for grant of bail to the applicant.

Learned Public Prosecutor for the non-applicant / State of Madhya Pradesh submits that no sufficient ground is made out for releasing the applicant on bail, hence the application filed by the applicant be dismissed.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, but without commenting on the merits of the case, the application filed by the applicant is allowed. The applicant is directed to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his regular appearance before the trial Court during trial with a condition that he / she shall remain present before the court concerned during trial and shall also abide by the conditions enumerated under Section 437 (3) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.

This order shall be effective till the end of the trial, however, in case of bail jump, it shall become ineffective.