High CourtsSingle Bench

Anil Dongre vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 12 January 2024 · Citation: (2024) 01 MP CK 0052

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dinesh Kumar Paliwal, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 389(1) · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 304A, 337, 338
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Appeal No. 812 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 470 words

Dinesh Kumar Paliwal, J

Call for the trial Court record.

Heard o n I.A. No.1011/2024, an application under Section 389(1) of Cr.P.C. for suspension of sentence and grant of bail to appellant.

Appellant has been convicted for commission of offence under Sections 304-A of IPC (on four counts) and has been sentenced to undergo R.I. for 02 years for each count and fine of Rs.2000/- for each count; under Section 338 (on 4 counts) of IPC and has been sentenced to undergo R.I. for 06 months for each count and fine of Rs.1000/- for each count and under Section 337 of IPC and has been sentenced to undergo R.I. for 03 months R.I. on each count and find of Rs.500/- for each count with default stipulations vide judgment dated 15.12.2023 delivered by Additional Sessions Judge, District Balaghat, (M.P.), in S.T. No.113/2020 (State of M.P. Vs. Anil Dongre).

Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that appellant has not committed any offence. He has been erroneously convicted by the trial Court. It is submitted that in the course of trial appellant was on bail. He has not misused the liberty granted by way of bail during trial. Even after conviction and passing of order of jail sentence, learned trial Court itself had suspended the jail sentence of the appellant till 30.1.2024. The appellant has fair chance to succeed in the appeal. It is further submitted that a short sentence has been awarded by the trial Court and there is no possibility of hearing of this appeal in near future. Therefore, if the execution of jail sentence of appellant is not suspended, the purpose of filing this appeal would become futile. Therefore, it has been prayed that the execution of jail sentence of appellant be suspended and he be released on bail.

On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent/State has opposed the grant of bail to the appellant.

Having considered the short nature of sentence and the fact that there is no possibility of hearing of this appeal in near future, I am inclined to suspend the remaining jail sentence of the appellant.

Consequently, I.A. No.1011/2024 is allowed. The execution of jail sentence of appellant- Anil Dongre is hereby suspended subject to depositing the fine amount, (if not already deposited). It is directed that the appellant be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond to a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court with a further direction to appear before the trial Court on 30.4.2024 and also on such other dates, as may be fixed by that Court in this regard during the pendency of this appeal.

List this case for admission after receipt of trial Court record.

Certified copy as per rules.