High CourtsSingle Bench

Anil Goyal vs Prakash Plastic Industries & Ors

Delhi High Court · Decided on 9 October 2020 · Citation: (2020) 10 DEL CK 0068

HON’BLE JUDGES
C. Hari Shankar, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 29A(4), 29A(5)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Original Miscellaneous Petition (MISC.)(COMM.) No. 173 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 159 words

C. Hari Shankar, J

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 173/2020

1.

This is a petition under sub-sections (4) and (5) of Section 29-A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, praying for extension of time for the conclusion of the arbitral proceedings and rendering an award thereon, by the learned sole arbitrator, by a further of period of 12 months.

2.

Mr. Pranav Proothi, learned counsel appearing for the respondents, does not object to the request, but prays that as there has been an unnecessary delay in the proceedings, this Court may pass appropriate directions to ensure that unnecessary adjournments are not taken.

3.

In view thereof, this petition is disposed of by extending the time available with the learned sole arbitrator to conclude the proceedings and render the award, by a further period of 12 months from today.

4.

Learned sole arbitrator would proceed in the matter with all due expedition and ensure that unnecessary adjournments are not granted to either party.