High CourtsDivision Bench

Anil Kumar vs State Of Himachal Pradesh & Others

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 18 May 2020 · Citation: (2020) 05 SHI CK 0036

HON’BLE JUDGES
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J · Anoop Chitkara, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
CWPOA No. 4567 Of 2020

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 152 words

Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he is under instructions not to press this writ petition provided that he is granted liberty to file representation to the respondents under the new Policy relating to appointment on compassionate grounds. The prayer being innocuous is allowed. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make a representation, in accordance with the aforesaid policy. The petitioner shall positively make a representation within four weeks from today. The respondents in turn will consider the same within further period of four weeks from the receipt thereof. Needless to say that the order so passed shall be self contained and speaking one. It goes without saying that in case the petitioner still feels aggrieved, he shall be at liberty to approach this Court. Parties to bear their own costs. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.